GLM 4.6 vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GLM 4.6 vs. Hermes 3 70B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Hermes 3 70B Instruct was released 1 year before GLM 4.6.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 204.8K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | September 30, 2025 10 months ago September 30th, 2025 | August 18, 2024 1 year ago August 18th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2023 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 4.6 | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Llama3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
GLM 4.6 is roughly 0.7x less expensive compared to Hermes 3 70B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 2.9x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.50 per million tokens | $0.70 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.00 per million tokens | $0.70 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.10 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 4.6 and Hermes 3 70B Instruct.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 28.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 45.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 17.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,207 Elo (#44 in Game Dev (54.6% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 4.6 and Hermes 3 70B Instruct unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 4.6 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Hermes 3 70B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks