R1 vs Kimi K3 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
R1 was released 1 year before Kimi K3.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 16K tokens | Not specified tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | January 20, 2025 1 year ago January 20th, 2025 | July 16, 2026 11 days ago July 16th, 2026 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | July 31, 2024 | Not reported |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
R1 | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🖼️Image |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Always enabled | Enabled by defaultEffort: Max, High, LowDefault: Max |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Proprietary |
Pricing
R1 is roughly 0.2x less expensive compared to Kimi K3 for input tokens and roughly 0.2x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.70 per million tokens | $3.00 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.50 per million tokens | $15.00 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.30 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between R1 and Kimi K3.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 18.5 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 57.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 24.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 76.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 3.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 50.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,456 Elo (#1 in 3D (69.2% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes R1 and Kimi K3 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare R1 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Kimi K3 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks