Magica logo

R1 vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: R1 vs. MiMo-V2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

R1 was released 1 year before MiMo-V2.5.
R1R1
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
163.8K
tokens
1.1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
16K
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
January 20th, 2025
April 22nd, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
July 31, 2024
Not reported

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
R1
MiMo-V2.5
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Always enabled
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

R1 is roughly 5.0x more expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 8.9x more expensive for output tokens.
R1R1
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.70
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$2.50
per million tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
Not specified
$0.0028
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between R1 and MiMo-V2.5.
R1R1
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
18.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
24.6
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
3.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
Benchmark not available.
1,301 Elo
(#16 in Game Dev (56.5% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes R1 and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
DeepSeek logoR1 by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 163.8K token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.70/M input and $2.50/M output tokens. Released January 20th, 2025.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare R1 with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🔬Science

Scientific research and analysis

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with: