PwC plans judgment certificate for 85,000-plus staff as AI reshapes learning
PwC US plans a December launch for a critical-thinking and judgment certificate, with completion targeted by June 2027. It will assess staff through performance reviews as the firm seeks new ways to develop skills once practiced through routine work.
- More than 85,000 PwC partners and employees are covered by the planned certificate.
- Simulations and an AI coach will support practice; proficiency will feed into performance reviews.
- PwC plans to share its framework with universities, but evidence of the program’s effectiveness remains to be established.
PwC US plans to launch a critical-thinking and judgment certificate for more than 85,000 partners and employees in December 2026. The accounting and advisory firm says AI is taking over foundational work that has traditionally helped its people learn to make decisions.
Its November 9 announcement targets completion by June 2027 across its US and Mexico offices and Acceleration Centers. Those centers support client work and business operations. The program combines a proprietary framework, diagnostic exercises, masterclasses, personalized simulations and tools for daily work.
The stakes extend beyond learning to operate AI tools. PwC provides audit and assurance, tax and consulting services, where employees must evaluate evidence and defend recommendations. It is also investing in AI services for clients and in automating its own work. The certificate will connect deliberate practice in judgment to the firm’s performance-review process.

Company-reported plans cover more than 85,000 people and estimated investment exceeding $100 million, including development and university funding. Graphic: Magica. Source: Bloomberg Law.
Practicing judgment as the work changes
PwC said in an interview about the rollout that first-year associates already do different work from two years ago. Participants will begin by examining their thinking preferences and strengths, then learn how to establish context, evaluate information, challenge assumptions and communicate recommendations.
The practical exercises matter because a convincing AI answer can still need checking. In one example supplied by PwC, a tax professional reviews an AI-generated analysis of a complex tax position whose supporting information may be incomplete. The participant must question sources, consider alternative interpretations and identify what else is needed before reaching a conclusion.
